Like the site? Keep us running by whitelisting EndTimesWire.com in your AD Blocker.
Thanks and God bless!   Close  [x]

Linda Sarsour’s ‘Jihad’ Speech Suppressing Her Political Support

Linda Sarsour’s ‘Jihad’ Speech Suppressing Her Political Support

Many left-wing progressive and Islamic political groups have quietly walked away from Islamic activist Linda Sarsour since her incendiary July 1 appeal for Muslims in America to declare jihad on elected President Donald Trump.

She is getting sharp-eyed criticism from experts on Islam for her call to jihad against Trump — and for her calls for Islamic self-segregation and loyalty to Allah only. But she is getting only tepid and perfunctory public support from her usual alliance of Islamic and progressive allies.

Her supporting hashtag, #IStandWithLinda, shows few tweets of support from well-known Democrats, and a growing number of critics.

Very few politicians, political donors or progressive activists have spoken up in her favor. For example, she has got no support from Bernie Sanders whom she supported throughout the 2016 election.

Few media outlets are broadcasting her novel claim that jihad actually means public criticism. The New York Times posted a gushing article in 2015 about the “Brooklyn Homegirl in a Hijab,” but has completely ignored her after the speech. HuffPo has posted just two weak op-eds defending her jihad advocacy, and Buzzfeed has not said anything since legal correspondent Chris Geidner tweeted out a defense of her without recognizing Sarsour’s multiple references to jihad in her “word of truth” phrase.

Geidner and Sarsour did not respond to a messages from Breitbart News.

Time magazine did post an article titled “Women’s March Organizer Linda Sarsour Spoke of ‘Jihad.’ But She Wasn’t Talking About Violence.” The site didn’t accept readers’ comments and has not posted an update.

The Washington Post has not posted any reported article defending her call for jihad but did print her evasive op-ed. Yet the most-liked comment response to her op-ed in the progressive paper declared:

As an atheist, I feel confident that i am able to voice my opinion to my peers without fear of reprisal. The same can not be said if i were in a Islam majority country. The current brand of Islam is the opposite of liberalism. I don’t want anyone calling for “Jihad” or holy war on anyone. Regardless of how a person meant it. Hundreds of millions have died and science has been stomped out in the name of Jihad.

The second-most approved comment said:

WAPO would not and should not accept editorials from David Duke. So why provide a legitimizing platform for Sarsour, who is equally hateful?

The comments show that “there is is a general cynicism about the idea that Islam is a religion of peace,” said Robert Spencer, the author of several best-selling books about Islam, and the operator of the JihadWatch.org website. The idea “is met with ridicule,” he added.

Read the rest…


Posted in: Israel News + World News

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

Leave a Reply

wpDiscuz

Godstrong Women is a Facebook Community to connect and strengthen Christian women from around the world.Godstrong Men is a Facebook Community to connect and strengthen Christian men from around the world.RevivedLife.com offers uplifting devotionals and prayers that should inspire you to know Jesus as your Savior and to grow in grace.Revived Wire Media - Design, Development and Hosting by RevivedWire.com

Subscribe to Site

Win a Google Pixel 2 from Phandroid!
Win an Apple iPhone X from iDropNews!
Win an Apple Macbook Pro from iDropNews!

Verse for 11/17/2017

Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. — Psalm 119:105

Site Search


End Times Wire Poll

Should the US move its embassy to Jerusalem?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

These 'Shining Light Ministries' rank highly because of their willingness to be transparent and accountable with their donations and finances.

Children's Hunger Fund

Medical Teams International

Mercy Multiplied